mirror of
https://github.com/verdaccio/verdaccio.git
synced 2024-11-08 23:25:51 +01:00
move eslint config to yaml
This commit is contained in:
Alex Kocharin
parent
e2e2c39148
commit
b65cf7afe3
264
.eslint.js
264
.eslint.js
@ -1,264 +0,0 @@
|
||||
module.exports = {
|
||||
env: {
|
||||
node: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* 0 - disable
|
||||
* Rules that more harmful than useful, or just buggy.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1 - warning
|
||||
* Rules that we didn't encounter yet. You can safely ignore them,
|
||||
* but I'd like to know any interesting use-cases they forbid.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 2 - error
|
||||
* Rules that have proven to be useful, please follow them.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
rules: {
|
||||
// didn't understand what it does, but it fails a good code
|
||||
'block-scoped-var': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails where newlines are used to format pretty big "if":
|
||||
// if (
|
||||
// name.charAt(0) === "." ||
|
||||
// name.match(/[\/@\s\+%:]/) ||
|
||||
// name !== encodeURIComponent(name) ||
|
||||
// name.toLowerCase() === "node_modules"
|
||||
// ) {
|
||||
'brace-style': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// snake_case is more readable, what's up with you guys?
|
||||
'camelcase': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// if some functions are complex, they are for a good reason,
|
||||
// ain't worth it
|
||||
'complexity': [0, 10],
|
||||
|
||||
// never saw it, but self is preferred
|
||||
'consistent-this': [1, 'self'],
|
||||
|
||||
// fails good code
|
||||
'curly': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails good code, where this notation is used for consistency:
|
||||
// something['foo-bar'] = 123
|
||||
// something['blahblah'] = 234
|
||||
'dot-notation': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// pointless in many cases (like indexOf() == -1), harmful in a few
|
||||
// cases (when you do want to ignore types), fails good code
|
||||
'eqeqeq': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// if someone is changing prototype and makes properties enumerable,
|
||||
// it's their own fault
|
||||
'guard-for-in': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// if some functions are complex, they are for a good reason,
|
||||
// ain't worth it
|
||||
'max-depth': [0, 4],
|
||||
|
||||
// should it really throw for every long URL?
|
||||
'max-len': [0, 80, 4],
|
||||
|
||||
// that's obvious by just looking at the code, you don't need lint for that
|
||||
'max-params': [0, 3],
|
||||
|
||||
// if some functions are complex, they are for a good reason,
|
||||
// ain't worth it
|
||||
'max-statements': [0, 10],
|
||||
|
||||
// that one makes sense
|
||||
'new-cap': 2,
|
||||
|
||||
'new-parens': 1,
|
||||
'no-alert': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// I'm writing javascript, not some weird reduced version of it
|
||||
'no-bitwise': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-caller': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// not working around IE bugs, sorry
|
||||
'no-catch-shadow': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// see above, IE is useful for downloading other browsers only
|
||||
'no-comma-dangle': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-cond-assign': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// good for removing debugging code
|
||||
'no-console': 2,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-control-regex': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// good for removing debugging code
|
||||
'no-debugger': 2,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-delete-var': 1,
|
||||
'no-div-regex': 1,
|
||||
'no-dupe-keys': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// why would anyone need to check against that?
|
||||
'no-else-return': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// sometimes empty statement contains useful comment
|
||||
'no-empty': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-empty-class': 1,
|
||||
'no-empty-label': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// stupid rule
|
||||
// "x == null" is "x === null || x === undefined"
|
||||
'no-eq-null': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-eval': 1,
|
||||
'no-ex-assign': 1,
|
||||
'no-extend-native': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails good code, when parens are used for grouping:
|
||||
// (req && req.headers['via']) ? req.headers['via'] + ', ' : ''
|
||||
// not everyone remembers priority tables, you know
|
||||
'no-extra-parens': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails defensive semicolons:
|
||||
// ;['foo', 'bar'].forEach(function(x) {})
|
||||
'no-extra-semi': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-fallthrough': 1,
|
||||
'no-floating-decimal': 1,
|
||||
'no-func-assign': 1,
|
||||
'no-global-strict': 1,
|
||||
'no-implied-eval': 1,
|
||||
'no-invalid-regexp': 1,
|
||||
'no-iterator': 1,
|
||||
'no-label-var': 1,
|
||||
'no-loop-func': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails good code:
|
||||
// var fs = require('fs'),
|
||||
// , open = fs.open
|
||||
'no-mixed-requires': [0, false],
|
||||
|
||||
'no-multi-str': 1,
|
||||
'no-native-reassign': 1,
|
||||
'no-negated-in-lhs': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// XXX: not released yet
|
||||
//'no-nested-ternary': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-new': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// new Array(12) is used to pre-allocate arrays
|
||||
'no-new-array': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-new-func': 1,
|
||||
'no-new-object': 1,
|
||||
'no-new-wrappers': 1,
|
||||
'no-obj-calls': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails good code:
|
||||
// fs.open('/file', 0666, function(){})
|
||||
'no-octal': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails good code:
|
||||
// console.log('\033[31m' + str + '\033[39m')
|
||||
// also fails \0 which is not octal escape
|
||||
'no-octal-escape': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// I'm writing javascript, not some weird reduced version of it
|
||||
'no-plusplus': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-proto': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails good code:
|
||||
// if (a) {
|
||||
// var x = 'foo'
|
||||
// } else {
|
||||
// var x = bar
|
||||
// }
|
||||
'no-redeclare': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-return-assign': 1,
|
||||
'no-script-url': 1,
|
||||
'no-self-compare': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// sometimes useful, often isn't
|
||||
// probably worth enforcing
|
||||
'no-shadow': 2,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-shadow-restricted-names': 1,
|
||||
'no-spaced-func': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// can't agree more, but it's a task for code review, not for lint
|
||||
'no-sync': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// I'm writing javascript, not some weird reduced version of it
|
||||
'no-ternary': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// the single most important rule in the entire ruleset
|
||||
'no-undef': 2,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-undef-init': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// it is failing our own underscores
|
||||
'no-underscore-dangle': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails function hoisting
|
||||
'no-unreachable': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails npm-style code, it's good once you get used to it:
|
||||
// if (typeof(options) === 'function') callback = options, options = {}
|
||||
'no-unused-expressions': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails (function(_err) {}) where named argument is used to show what
|
||||
// nth function argument means
|
||||
'no-unused-vars': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails function hoisting
|
||||
'no-use-before-define': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
'no-with': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails foobar( (function(){}).bind(this) )
|
||||
// parens are added for readability
|
||||
'no-wrap-func': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails good code:
|
||||
// var x
|
||||
// if (something) {
|
||||
// var y
|
||||
'one-var': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// the most stupid rule I ever saw
|
||||
'quote-props': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails situation when different quotes are used to avoid escaping
|
||||
'quotes': [0, 'single'],
|
||||
|
||||
'radix': 1,
|
||||
'regex-spaces': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// http://blog.izs.me/post/2353458699/an-open-letter-to-javascript-leaders-regarding
|
||||
'semi': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// fails good code where spaces are used for grouping:
|
||||
// (x+y * y+z)
|
||||
'space-infix-ops': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
'space-return-throw-case': 1,
|
||||
|
||||
// typeof(something) should have braces to look like a function
|
||||
// a matter of taste I suppose
|
||||
'space-unary-word-ops': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// strict mode is just harmful,
|
||||
// can I have a check to enforce not using it?
|
||||
'strict': 0,
|
||||
|
||||
'unnecessary-strict': 1,
|
||||
'use-isnan': 1,
|
||||
'wrap-iife': 1,
|
||||
'wrap-regex': 1,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
263
.eslint.yaml
Normal file
263
.eslint.yaml
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
|
||||
env:
|
||||
node: true
|
||||
|
||||
#
|
||||
# 0 - disable
|
||||
# Rules that more harmful than useful, or just buggy.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# 1 - warning
|
||||
# Rules that we didn't encounter yet. You can safely ignore them,
|
||||
# but I'd like to know any interesting use-cases they forbid.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# 2 - error
|
||||
# Rules that have proven to be useful, please follow them.
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
rules:
|
||||
# didn't understand what it does, but it fails a good code
|
||||
block-scoped-var: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# fails where newlines are used to format pretty big "if":
|
||||
# if (
|
||||
# name.charAt(0) === "." ||
|
||||
# name.match(/[\/@\s\+%:]/) ||
|
||||
# name !== encodeURIComponent(name) ||
|
||||
# name.toLowerCase() === "node_modules"
|
||||
# ) {
|
||||
brace-style: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# snake_case is more readable, what's up with you guys?
|
||||
camelcase: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# if some functions are complex, they are for a good reason,
|
||||
# ain't worth it
|
||||
complexity: [0, 10]
|
||||
|
||||
# never saw it, but self is preferred
|
||||
consistent-this: [1, 'self']
|
||||
|
||||
# fails good code
|
||||
curly: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# fails good code, where this notation is used for consistency:
|
||||
# something['foo-bar'] = 123
|
||||
# something['blahblah'] = 234
|
||||
dot-notation: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# pointless in many cases (like indexOf() == -1), harmful in a few
|
||||
# cases (when you do want to ignore types), fails good code
|
||||
eqeqeq: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# if someone is changing prototype and makes properties enumerable,
|
||||
# it's their own fault
|
||||
guard-for-in: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# if some functions are complex, they are for a good reason,
|
||||
# ain't worth it
|
||||
max-depth: [0, 4]
|
||||
|
||||
# should it really throw for every long URL?
|
||||
max-len: [0, 80, 4]
|
||||
|
||||
# that's obvious by just looking at the code, you don't need lint for that
|
||||
max-params: [0, 3]
|
||||
|
||||
# if some functions are complex, they are for a good reason,
|
||||
# ain't worth it
|
||||
max-statements: [0, 10]
|
||||
|
||||
# that one makes sense
|
||||
new-cap: 2
|
||||
|
||||
new-parens: 1
|
||||
no-alert: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# I'm writing javascript, not some weird reduced version of it
|
||||
no-bitwise: 0
|
||||
|
||||
no-caller: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# not working around IE bugs, sorry
|
||||
no-catch-shadow: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# see above, IE is useful for downloading other browsers only
|
||||
no-comma-dangle: 0
|
||||
|
||||
no-cond-assign: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# good for removing debugging code
|
||||
no-console: 2
|
||||
|
||||
no-control-regex: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# good for removing debugging code
|
||||
no-debugger: 2
|
||||
|
||||
no-delete-var: 1
|
||||
no-div-regex: 1
|
||||
no-dupe-keys: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# why would anyone need to check against that?
|
||||
no-else-return: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# sometimes empty statement contains useful comment
|
||||
no-empty: 0
|
||||
|
||||
no-empty-class: 1
|
||||
no-empty-label: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# stupid rule
|
||||
# "x == null" is "x === null || x === undefined"
|
||||
no-eq-null: 0
|
||||
|
||||
no-eval: 1
|
||||
no-ex-assign: 1
|
||||
no-extend-native: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# fails good code, when parens are used for grouping:
|
||||
# (req && req.headers['via']) ? req.headers['via'] + ', ' : ''
|
||||
# not everyone remembers priority tables, you know
|
||||
no-extra-parens: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# fails defensive semicolons:
|
||||
# ;['foo', 'bar'].forEach(function(x) {})
|
||||
no-extra-semi: 0
|
||||
|
||||
no-fallthrough: 1
|
||||
no-floating-decimal: 1
|
||||
no-func-assign: 1
|
||||
no-global-strict: 1
|
||||
no-implied-eval: 1
|
||||
no-invalid-regexp: 1
|
||||
no-iterator: 1
|
||||
no-label-var: 1
|
||||
no-loop-func: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# fails good code:
|
||||
# var fs = require('fs'),
|
||||
# , open = fs.open
|
||||
no-mixed-requires: [0, false]
|
||||
|
||||
no-multi-str: 1
|
||||
no-native-reassign: 1
|
||||
no-negated-in-lhs: 1
|
||||
|
||||
no-nested-ternary: 1
|
||||
|
||||
no-new: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# new Array(12) is used to pre-allocate arrays
|
||||
no-new-array: 0
|
||||
|
||||
no-new-func: 1
|
||||
no-new-object: 1
|
||||
no-new-wrappers: 1
|
||||
no-obj-calls: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# fails good code:
|
||||
# fs.open('/file', 0666, function(){})
|
||||
no-octal: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# fails good code:
|
||||
# console.log('\033[31m' + str + '\033[39m')
|
||||
# also fails \0 which is not octal escape
|
||||
no-octal-escape: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# I'm writing javascript, not some weird reduced version of it
|
||||
no-plusplus: 0
|
||||
|
||||
no-proto: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# fails good code:
|
||||
# if (a) {
|
||||
# var x = 'foo'
|
||||
# } else {
|
||||
# var x = bar
|
||||
# }
|
||||
no-redeclare: 0
|
||||
|
||||
no-return-assign: 1
|
||||
no-script-url: 1
|
||||
no-self-compare: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# sometimes useful, often isn't
|
||||
# probably worth enforcing
|
||||
no-shadow: 2
|
||||
|
||||
no-shadow-restricted-names: 1
|
||||
no-spaced-func: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# can't agree more, but it's a task for code review, not for lint
|
||||
no-sync: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# I'm writing javascript, not some weird reduced version of it
|
||||
no-ternary: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# the single most important rule in the entire ruleset
|
||||
no-undef: 2
|
||||
|
||||
no-undef-init: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# it is failing our own underscores
|
||||
no-underscore-dangle: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# fails function hoisting
|
||||
no-unreachable: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# fails npm-style code, it's good once you get used to it:
|
||||
# if (typeof(options) === 'function') callback = options, options = {}
|
||||
no-unused-expressions: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# fails (function(_err) {}) where named argument is used to show what
|
||||
# nth function argument means
|
||||
no-unused-vars: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# fails function hoisting
|
||||
no-use-before-define: 0
|
||||
|
||||
no-with: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# fails foobar( (function(){}).bind(this) )
|
||||
# parens are added for readability
|
||||
no-wrap-func: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# fails good code:
|
||||
# var x
|
||||
# if (something) {
|
||||
# var y
|
||||
one-var: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# the most stupid rule I ever saw
|
||||
quote-props: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# fails situation when different quotes are used to avoid escaping
|
||||
quotes: [0, 'single']
|
||||
|
||||
radix: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# http:#blog.izs.me/post/2353458699/an-open-letter-to-javascript-leaders-regarding
|
||||
semi: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# fails good code where spaces are used for grouping:
|
||||
# (x+y * y+z)
|
||||
space-infix-ops: 0
|
||||
|
||||
space-return-throw-case: 1
|
||||
|
||||
# typeof(something) should have braces to look like a function
|
||||
# a matter of taste I suppose
|
||||
space-unary-word-ops: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# strict mode is just harmful,
|
||||
# can I have a check to enforce not using it?
|
||||
strict: 0
|
||||
|
||||
use-isnan: 1
|
||||
wrap-iife: 1
|
||||
wrap-regex: 1
|
||||
|
||||
no-path-concat: 0
|
||||
|
||||
# how can you set a return code without process.exit?
|
||||
no-process-exit: 0
|
||||
|
||||
11
.npmignore
Normal file
11
.npmignore
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
node_modules
|
||||
package.json
|
||||
npm-debug.log
|
||||
sinopia-*.tgz
|
||||
|
||||
###
|
||||
bin/storage*
|
||||
bin/*.yaml
|
||||
test-storage*
|
||||
|
||||
/.eslint*
|
||||
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ module.exports.basic_auth = function basic_auth(callback) {
|
||||
, credentials = new Buffer(parts[1], 'base64').toString()
|
||||
, index = credentials.indexOf(':')
|
||||
|
||||
if ('Basic' != scheme || index < 0) return next({
|
||||
if (scheme !== 'Basic' || index < 0) return next({
|
||||
status: 400,
|
||||
msg: 'bad authorization header',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ devDependencies:
|
||||
mocha: '>= 1.17.0'
|
||||
|
||||
# linting tools
|
||||
eslint: '~ 0.2.0'
|
||||
eslint: 'eslint/eslint'
|
||||
#eslint-stylish: '*'
|
||||
|
||||
# for debugging memory leaks, it'll be require()'d if
|
||||
@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ keywords:
|
||||
|
||||
scripts:
|
||||
test: mocha ./test/functional ./test/unit
|
||||
lint: eslint -c ./.eslint.js ./lib
|
||||
lint: eslint -c ./.eslint.yaml ./lib
|
||||
|
||||
# we depend on streams2 stuff
|
||||
# it can be replaced with isaacs/readable-stream, ask if you need to use 0.8
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user