1
0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea synced 2024-11-14 01:35:54 +01:00
Commit Graph

796 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
zeripath
8598356df1
Refactor and tidy-up the merge/update branch code (#22568)
The merge and update branch code was previously a little tangled and had
some very long functions. The functions were not very clear in their
reasoning and there were deficiencies in their logging and at least one
bug in the handling of LFS for update by rebase.

This PR substantially refactors this code and splits things out to into
separate functions. It also attempts to tidy up the calls by wrapping
things in "context"s. There are also attempts to improve logging when
there are errors.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-03-07 15:07:35 -05:00
wxiaoguang
6886706f5a
Fix broken code editor diff preview (#23307)
Close #23265, the code editor diff preview has been broken for long
time.

* Fix the regression for `data-line-num`
    * `.code-diff` is necessary to show the line number
* Fix the regression for #12434
* The diff:
[12434](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/12434/files?diff=unified&w=1)
    * It hides the Type(4) (aka HunkHeader)  for unexpected cases.


Diff with ignoring whitespaces:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23307/files?diff=unified&w=1

Before: see the issue #23265

After:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/222942810-286dc9af-0b39-4e9d-8585-8c299b881241.png)
2023-03-06 09:37:58 +08:00
wxiaoguang
188c8c12c2
Make Ctrl+Enter submit a pending comment (starting review) instead of submitting a single comment (#23245)
Close #23241

Before: press Ctrl+Enter in the Code Review Form, a single comment will
be added.

After: press Ctrl+Enter in the Code Review Form, start the review with
pending comments.


The old name `is_review` is not clear, so the new code use
`pending_review` as the new name.

Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-03-04 02:13:37 -05:00
Jason Song
47b912cd52
Avoid panic caused by broken payload when creating commit status (#23216)
When creating commit status for Actons jobs, a payload with nil
`HeadCommit` will cause panic.

Reported at:
https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/28#issuecomment-732166

Although the `HeadCommit` probably can not be nil after #23215,
`CreateCommitStatus` should protect itself, to avoid being broken in the
future.

In addition, it's enough to print error log instead of returning err
when `CreateCommitStatus` failed.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-03-04 02:12:37 -05:00
Jason Song
7b9e23cc1d
Fill head commit to in payload when notifying push commits for mirroring (#23215)
Just like what has been done when pushing manually:

7a5af25592/services/repository/push.go (L225-L226)

Before:

<img width="448" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/222100123-cd4839d1-2d4d-45f7-b7a0-0cbc73162b44.png">

After:

<img width="448" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/222100225-f3c5bb65-7ab9-41e2-8e39-9d84c23c352d.png">

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-03-03 23:45:53 -05:00
sillyguodong
2f49b55c19
Fix cannot reopen after pushing commits to a closed PR (#23189)
Close: #22784

1. On GH, we can reopen a PR which was closed before after pushing
commits. After reopening PR, we can see the commits that were pushed
after closing PR in the time line. So the case of
[issue](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22784) is a bug which
needs to be fixed.

2. After closing a PR and pushing commits, `headBranchSha` is not equal
to `sha`(which is the last commit ID string of reference). If the
judgement exists, the button of reopen will not display. So, skip the
judgement if the status of PR is closed.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222037529-651fccf9-0bba-433e-b2f0-79c17e0cc812.png)

3. Even if PR is already close, we should still insert comment record
into DB when we push commits.
So we should still call  function `CreatePushPullComment()`.

067b0c2664/services/pull/pull.go (L260-L282)
So, I add a switch(`includeClosed`) to the
`GetUnmergedPullRequestsByHeadInfo` func to control whether the status
of PR must be open. In this case, by setting `includeClosed` to `true`,
we can query the closed PR.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222621045-bb80987c-10c5-4eac-aa0c-1fb9c6aefb51.png)

4. In the loop of comments, I use the`latestCloseCommentID` variable to
record the last occurrence of the close comment.
In the go template, if the status of PR is closed, the comments whose
type is `CommentTypePullRequestPush(29)` after `latestCloseCommentID`
won't be rendered.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222058913-c91cf3e3-819b-40c5-8015-654b31eeccff.png)
e.g.
1). The initial status of the PR is opened.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453617-33c5093e-f712-4cd6-8489-9f87e2075869.png)
2). Then I click the button of `Close`.  PR is closed now.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453694-25c588a9-c121-4897-9ae5-0b13cf33d20b.png)
3). I try to push a commit to this PR, even though its current status is
closed.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453916-361678fb-7321-410d-9e37-5a26e8095638.png)
But in comments list, this commit do not display.This is as expected :)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454169-7617a791-78d2-404e-be5e-77d555f93313.png)
4). Click the `Reopen` button, the commit which is pushed after closing
PR display now.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454533-897893b6-b96e-4701-b5cb-b1800f382b8f.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-03-03 21:16:58 +08:00
Lauris BH
58b4143803
Add loading yaml label template files (#22976)
Extract from #11669 and enhancement to #22585 to support exclusive
scoped labels in label templates

* Move label template functionality to label module
* Fix handling of color codes
* Add Advanced label template
2023-03-02 01:44:23 +02:00
Brecht Van Lommel
0268ee5c37
Do not create commit graph for temporary repos (#23219)
When fetching remotes for conflict checking, skip unnecessary and
potentially slow writing of commit graphs.

In a test with the Blender repository, this reduces conflict checking
time for one pull request from about 2s to 0.1s.
2023-03-01 14:19:04 -05:00
Jason Song
04347eb810
Use context parameter in services/repository (#23186)
Use context parameter in `services/repository`.

And use `cache.WithCacheContext(ctx)` to generate push action history
feeds.

Fix #23160
2023-02-28 16:17:51 -06:00
Jason Song
edf98a2dc3
Require approval to run actions for fork pull request (#22803)
Currently, Gitea will run actions automatically which are triggered by
fork pull request. It's a security risk, people can create a PR and
modify the workflow yamls to execute a malicious script.

So we should require approval for first-time contributors, which is the
default strategy of a public repo on GitHub, see [Approving workflow
runs from public
forks](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/approving-workflow-runs-from-public-forks).

Current strategy:

- don't need approval if it's not a fork PR;
- always need approval if the user is restricted;
- don't need approval if the user can write;
- don't need approval if the user has been approved before;
- otherwise, need approval.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217207121-badf50a8-826c-4425-bef1-d82d1979bc81.mov

GitHub has an option for that, you can see that at
`/<owner>/<repo>/settings/actions`, and we can support that later.

<img width="835" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217199990-2967e68b-e693-4e59-8186-ab33a1314a16.png">

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-24 15:58:49 +08:00
sillyguodong
1f09051f2b
Fix SyncOnCommit always return false in API of push_mirrors (#23088)
Fix: #22990

---
Before, the return value of the api is always false,regrardless of
whether the entry of `sync_on_commit` is true or false.
I have confirmed that the value of `sync_on_commit` dropped into the
database is correct.
So, I think it is enough to make some small changes.
2023-02-23 15:50:33 -06:00
zeripath
1319ba6742
Use minio/sha256-simd for accelerated SHA256 (#23052)
minio/sha256-simd provides additional acceleration for SHA256 using
AVX512, SHA Extensions for x86 and ARM64 for ARM.

It provides a drop-in replacement for crypto/sha256 and if the
extensions are not available it falls back to standard crypto/sha256.

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-02-22 14:21:46 -05:00
Zettat123
4de5cd9f36
Return empty url for submodule tree entries (#23043)
Close #22614.

Refer to [Github's
API](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/git/trees?apiVersion=2022-11-28#get-a-tree),
if a tree entry is a submodule, its url will be an empty string.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-02-21 12:31:17 -05:00
Jason Song
c8c2a31818
Add force_merge to merge request and fix checking mergable (#23010)
Fix #23000.
2023-02-21 08:42:07 -06:00
wxiaoguang
dc9cebdf45
Use --message=%s for git commit message (#23028)
Close  #23027

`git commit` message option _only_ supports 4 formats (well, only ....):
* `"commit", "-m", msg`
* `"commit", "-m{msg}"`  (no space)
* `"commit", "--message", msg`
* `"commit", "--message={msg}"`

The long format with `=` is the best choice, and it's documented in `man
git-commit`:

`-m <msg>, --message=<msg> ...`

ps: I would suggest always use long format option for git command, as
much as possible.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-21 14:12:57 +08:00
zeripath
35d2fa744a
Fix intermittent panic in notify issue change content (#23019)
Ensure that issue pullrequests are loaded before trying to set the
self-reference.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-02-20 19:15:49 -05:00
Zettat123
9a83aa28a3
Get rules by id when editing branch protection rule (#22932)
When users rename an existing branch protection rule, a new rule with
the new name will be created and the old rule will still exist.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276442-d3c001ad-e693-44ec-9ad2-b33f2666b49b.png)

---

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276478-547c3b93-b3f1-4292-a1ef-c1b7747fe1bb.png)

The reason is that the `SettingsProtectedBranchPost` function only get
branch protection rule by name before updating or creating a rule. When
the rule name changes, the function cannot find the existing rule so it
will create a new rule rather than update the existing rule. To fix the
bug, the function should get rule by id first.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-20 19:30:41 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
c53ad052d8
Refactor the setting to make unit test easier (#22405)
Some bugs caused by less unit tests in fundamental packages. This PR
refactor `setting` package so that create a unit test will be easier
than before.

- All `LoadFromXXX` files has been splited as two functions, one is
`InitProviderFromXXX` and `LoadCommonSettings`. The first functions will
only include the code to create or new a ini file. The second function
will load common settings.
- It also renames all functions in setting from `newXXXService` to
`loadXXXSetting` or `loadXXXFrom` to make the function name less
confusing.
- Move `XORMLog` to `SQLLog` because it's a better name for that.

Maybe we should finally move these `loadXXXSetting` into the `XXXInit`
function? Any idea?

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-02-20 00:12:01 +08:00
yp05327
7eaf192967
Rename GetUnits to LoadUnits (#22970)
Same as https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22967

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-19 16:31:39 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
6221a6fd54
Scoped labels (#22585)
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.

The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.

Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.

In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.

Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:

* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.

Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:

* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.

Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:

* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 21:17:39 +02:00
yp05327
bd66fa586a
Rename repo.GetOwner to repo.LoadOwner (#22967)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22963

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
2023-02-18 20:11:03 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
bd820aa9c5
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294)
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.

But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.

The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
	ctx  context.Context
	data map[any]map[any]any
        lock sync.RWMutex
}

var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}

func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
	return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
		ctx:  ctx,
		data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
	})
}
```

Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.

```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```

Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.

```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
	return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
		return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
			res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
			if err != nil {
				return "", err
			}
			return res.SettingValue, nil
		})
	})
}
```

First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.

An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
2023-02-15 21:37:34 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
49919c636e
Pull Requests: setting to allow edits by maintainers by default, tweak UI (#22862)
Add setting to allow edits by maintainers by default, to avoid having to
often ask contributors to enable this.

This also reorganizes the pull request settings UI to improve clarity.
It was unclear which checkbox options were there to control available
merge styles and which merge styles they correspond to.

Now there is a "Merge Styles" label followed by the merge style options
with the same name as in other menus. The remaining checkboxes were
moved to the bottom, ordered rougly by typical order of operations.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-13 14:09:52 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
f2772b5920
Move delete user to service (#22478)
Move delete user to service

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-02-13 13:11:41 +08:00
sillyguodong
51ab495198
escape filename when assemble URL (#22850)
Fixes: #22843 

### Cause:

affdd40296/services/repository/files/content.go (L161)

Previously, we did not escape the **"%"** that might be in "treePath"
when call "url.parse()".


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/218066318-5a909e50-2a17-46e6-b32f-684b2aa4b91f.png)

This function will check whether "%" is the beginning of an escape
character. Obviously, the "%" in the example (hello%mother.txt) is not
that. So, the function will return a error.

### Solution:
We can escape "treePath" by call "url.PathEscape()" function firstly.

### Screenshot:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/218069781-1a030f8b-18d0-4804-b0f8-73997849ef43.png)

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-02-12 09:31:14 +08:00
Nathaniel Sabanski
fb1a2a13f0
Preview images for Issue cards in Project Board view (#22112)
Original Issue: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22102

This addition would be a big benefit for design and art teams using the
issue tracking.

The preview will be the latest "image type" attachments on an issue-
simple, and allows for automatic updates of the cover image as issue
progress is made!

This would make Gitea competitive with Trello... wouldn't it be amazing
to say goodbye to Atlassian products? Ha.

First image is the most recent, the SQL will fetch up to 5 latest images
(URL string).

All images supported by browsers plus upcoming formats: *.avif *.bmp
*.gif *.jpg *.jpeg *.jxl *.png *.svg *.webp

The CSS will try to center-align images until it cannot, then it will
left align with overflow hidden. Single images get to be slightly
larger!

Tested so far on: Chrome, Firefox, Android Chrome, Android Firefox.

Current revision with light and dark themes:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24665/207066878-58e6bf73-0c93-4caa-8d40-38f4432b3578.png)


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24665/207066555-293f65c3-e706-4888-8516-de8ec632d638.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-02-11 16:12:41 +08:00
wxiaoguang
e9288c2477
Fix improper HTMLURL usages in Go code (#22839)
In Go code, HTMLURL should be only used for external systems, like
API/webhook/mail/notification, etc.

If a URL is used by `Redirect` or rendered in a template, it should be a
relative URL (aka `Link()` in Gitea)

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-11 14:34:11 +08:00
Gusted
1cb8d14bf7
Use proxy for pull mirror (#22771)
- Use the proxy (if one is specified) for pull mirrors syncs.
- Pulled the code from
c2774d9e80/modules/git/repo.go (L164-L170)

Downstream issue: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/302

---------

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-11 08:39:50 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
bdd2c9d2ef
Fix update by rebase being wrongly disabled by protected base branch (#22825)
The branch this is force pushing to is the head branch in the head repo,
so it should be checking if that is protected, not the base.
2023-02-09 12:08:42 -05:00
John Olheiser
4dd7d61ac8
Load issue before accessing index in merge message (#22822)
Fixes #22821

Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-02-09 10:47:52 +08:00
KN4CK3R
e8186f1c0f
Map OIDC groups to Orgs/Teams (#21441)
Fixes #19555

Test-Instructions:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21441#issuecomment-1419438000

This PR implements the mapping of user groups provided by OIDC providers
to orgs teams in Gitea. The main part is a refactoring of the existing
LDAP code to make it usable from different providers.

Refactorings:
- Moved the router auth code from module to service because of import
cycles
- Changed some model methods to take a `Context` parameter
- Moved the mapping code from LDAP to a common location

I've tested it with Keycloak but other providers should work too. The
JSON mapping format is the same as for LDAP.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/195634392-3fc540fc-b229-4649-99ac-91ae8e19df2d.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-08 14:44:42 +08:00
KN4CK3R
f8c1e14a13
Use import of OCI structs (#22765)
Fixes #22758

Otherwise we would need to rewrite the structs in `oci.go`.
2023-02-06 10:07:09 +00:00
KN4CK3R
d987ac6bf1
Add Chef package registry (#22554)
This PR implements a [Chef registry](https://chef.io/) to manage
cookbooks. This package type was a bit complicated because Chef uses RSA
signed requests as authentication with the registry.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/213747995-46819fd8-c3d6-45a2-afd4-a4c3c8505a4a.png)


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/213748145-d01c9e81-d4dd-41e3-a3cc-8241862c3166.png)

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-06 09:49:21 +08:00
Jason Song
c18a62279a
Fix time to NotifyPullRequestSynchronized (#22650)
Should call `PushToBaseRepo` before
`notification.NotifyPullRequestSynchronized`.

Or the notifier will get an old commit when reading branch
`pull/xxx/head`.

Found by ~#21937~ #22679.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-05 19:57:38 +08:00
KN4CK3R
df789d962b
Add Cargo package registry (#21888)
This PR implements a [Cargo registry](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/)
to manage Rust packages. This package type was a little bit more
complicated because Cargo needs an additional Git repository to store
its package index.

Screenshots:

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/203102004-08d812ac-c066-4969-9bda-2fed818554eb.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/203102141-d9970f14-dca6-4174-b17a-50ba1bd79087.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/203102244-dc05743b-78b6-4d97-998e-ef76341a978f.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-05 18:12:31 +08:00
techknowlogick
2741546bed
Repositories: by default disable all units except code and pulls on forks (#22541)
Most of the time forks are used for contributing code only, so not
having
issues, projects, release and packages is a better default for such
cases.
They can still be enabled in the settings.

A new option `DEFAULT_FORK_REPO_UNITS` is added to configure the default
units on forks.

Also add missing `repo.packages` unit to documentation.

code by: @brechtvl

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️ 

When forking a repository, the fork will now have issues, projects,
releases, packages and wiki disabled. These can be enabled in the
repository settings afterwards. To change back to the previous default
behavior, configure `DEFAULT_FORK_REPO_UNITS` to be the same value as
`DEFAULT_REPO_UNITS`.

Co-authored-by: Brecht Van Lommel <brecht@blender.org>
2023-02-04 14:48:38 +08:00
wxiaoguang
6bc3079c00
Refactor git command package to improve security and maintainability (#22678)
This PR follows #21535 (and replace #22592)

## Review without space diff

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22678/files?diff=split&w=1

## Purpose of this PR

1. Make git module command completely safe (risky user inputs won't be
passed as argument option anymore)
2. Avoid low-level mistakes like
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22098#discussion_r1045234918
3. Remove deprecated and dirty `CmdArgCheck` function, hide the `CmdArg`
type
4. Simplify code when using git command

## The main idea of this PR

* Move the `git.CmdArg` to the `internal` package, then no other package
except `git` could use it. Then developers could never do
`AddArguments(git.CmdArg(userInput))` any more.
* Introduce `git.ToTrustedCmdArgs`, it's for user-provided and already
trusted arguments. It's only used in a few cases, for example: use git
arguments from config file, help unit test with some arguments.
* Introduce `AddOptionValues` and `AddOptionFormat`, they make code more
clear and simple:
    * Before: `AddArguments("-m").AddDynamicArguments(message)`
    * After: `AddOptionValues("-m", message)`
    * -
* Before: `AddArguments(git.CmdArg(fmt.Sprintf("--author='%s <%s>'",
sig.Name, sig.Email)))`
* After: `AddOptionFormat("--author='%s <%s>'", sig.Name, sig.Email)`

## FAQ

### Why these changes were not done in #21535 ?

#21535 is mainly a search&replace, it did its best to not change too
much logic.

Making the framework better needs a lot of changes, so this separate PR
is needed as the second step.


### The naming of `AddOptionXxx`

According to git's manual, the `--xxx` part is called `option`.

### How can it guarantee that `internal.CmdArg` won't be not misused?

Go's specification guarantees that. Trying to access other package's
internal package causes compilation error.

And, `golangci-lint` also denies the git/internal package. Only the
`git/command.go` can use it carefully.

### There is still a `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, will it still allow developers
to make mistakes and pass untrusted arguments?

Generally speaking, no. Because when using `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, the code
will be very complex (see the changes for examples). Then developers and
reviewers can know that something might be unreasonable.

### Why there was a `CmdArgCheck` and why it's removed?

At the moment of #21535, to reduce unnecessary changes, `CmdArgCheck`
was introduced as a hacky patch. Now, almost all code could be written
as `cmd := NewCommand(); cmd.AddXxx(...)`, then there is no need for
`CmdArgCheck` anymore.


### Why many codes for `signArg == ""` is deleted?

Because in the old code, `signArg` could never be empty string, it's
either `-S[key-id]` or `--no-gpg-sign`. So the `signArg == ""` is just
dead code.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-04 10:30:43 +08:00
zeripath
3c5655ce18
Improve trace logging for pulls and processes (#22633)
Our trace logging is far from perfect and is difficult to follow.

This PR:

* Add trace logging for process manager add and remove.
* Fixes an errant read file for git refs in getMergeCommit
* Brings in the pullrequest `String` and `ColorFormat` methods
introduced in #22568
* Adds a lot more logging in to testPR etc.

Ref #22578

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-02-03 18:11:48 -05:00
Pavel Ezhov
98770d3db8
Fix group filter for ldap source sync (#22506)
There are 2 separate flows of creating a user: authentication and source
sync.
When a group filter is defined, source sync ignores group filter, while
authentication respects it.
With this PR I've fixed this behavior, so both flows now apply this
filter when searching users in LDAP in a unified way.

- Unified LDAP group membership lookup for authentication and source
sync flows
- Replaced custom group membership lookup (used for authentication flow)
with an existing listLdapGroupMemberships method (used for source sync
flow)
- Modified listLdapGroupMemberships and getUserAttributeListedInGroup in
a way group lookup could be called separately
- Added user filtering based on a group membership for a source sync
- Added tests to cover this logic

Co-authored-by: Pavel Ezhov <paejov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-02 15:45:00 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
4e946e5a7d
Small refactor for loading PRs (#22652) 2023-02-01 21:49:28 -06:00
KN4CK3R
6ba9ff7b48
Add Conda package registry (#22262)
This PR adds a [Conda](https://conda.io/) package registry.
2023-02-01 12:30:39 -06:00
Lunny Xiao
2871ea0809
Add more events details supports for actions (#22680)
#21937 implemented only basic events based on name because of `act`'s
limitation. So I sent a PR to parse all possible events details in
https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/11 and it merged. The ref
documentation is
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows

This PR depends on that and make more detail responses for `push` events
and `pull_request` events. And it lefts more events there for future
PRs.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-02-01 13:32:46 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
faa96553d1
Add repository setting to enable/disable releases unit (#22671)
To go along with similar settings for issues, pulls, projects, packages.
2023-02-01 01:31:19 +00:00
Jason Song
707ecec715
Fix ref to trigger Actions (#22679)
If triggered by PR, the ref should be `pull/<index>/head` instead of
`repo.DefaultBranch`.

And improve UI:

<img width="493" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/215731280-312564f2-2450-45d0-b986-1accb0670976.png">


Related to #21937.
2023-01-31 22:45:25 +00:00
Jason Song
4011821c94
Implement actions (#21937)
Close #13539.

Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.

Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner

### Summary

The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:

- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.

**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.

### ⚠️ Breaking

`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.

### Some important reviews

- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868

### What it looks like

<details>

#### Manage runners

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png">

#### List runs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png">


#### View logs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png">



</details>

### How to try it

<details>

#### 1. Start Gitea

Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source).

Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:

```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```

Start it.

If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png">


#### 2. Start runner

Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md)
to start it.

If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png">

#### 3. Enable actions for a repo

Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png">

If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png">

#### 4. Upload workflow files

Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:

```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
  Explore-GitHub-Actions:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
      - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
      - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
      - name: Check out repository code
        uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
      - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
      - name: List files in the repository
        run: |
          ls ${{ github.workspace }}
      - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```

If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png">

#### 5. Check the logs of jobs

Click a run and you'll see the logs:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png">

#### 6. Go on

You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions)
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.

Come on, PRs are welcome.

</details>

See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/)

---------

Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 09:45:19 +08:00
KN4CK3R
d283a31f03
Check quota limits for container uploads (#22450)
The test coverage has revealed that container packages were not checked
against the quota limits.
2023-01-29 11:34:29 -06:00
zeripath
78e6b21c1a
Improve checkIfPRContentChanged (#22611)
The code for checking if a commit has caused a change in a PR is
extremely inefficient and affects the head repository instead of using a
temporary repository.

This PR therefore makes several significant improvements:

* A temporary repo like that used in merging.
* The diff code is then significant improved to use a three-way diff
instead of comparing diffs (possibly binary) line-by-line - in memory...

Ref #22578

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-28 15:54:40 +00:00
a1012112796
48f5d51908
fix permission check for creating comment while mail (#22524)
only creating comment on locked issue request write permission,
for others, read permission is enough.

related to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22056

/cc @KN4CK3R

---------

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-28 17:28:55 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
c8139c0f64
Webhooks: for issue close/reopen action, add commit ID that caused it (#22583)
The `commit_id` property name is the same as equivalent functionality in
GitHub. If the action was not caused by a commit, an empty string is
used.

This can for example be used to automatically add a Resolved label to an
issue fixed by a commit, or clear it when the issue is reopened.
2023-01-24 23:47:53 -05:00
Sybren
25f4b7d7cd
Prevent duplicate labels when importing more than 99 (#22591)
Importing labels (via `gitea restore-repo`) did not split them up into
batches properly. The first "batch" would create all labels, the second
"batch" would create all labels except those in the first "batch", etc.
This meant that when importing more than 99 labels (the batch size)
there would always be duplicate ones.

This is solved by actually passing `labels[:lbBatchSize]` to the
`CreateLabels()` function, instead of the entire list `labels`.
2023-01-24 19:44:55 +00:00